Kolegice morate imat viziju i maštu…nigdje burza ne ide u mp3 bit ce sve dobro i izravnat ce se uskoro fundamentalni gap
[/quote]
A osim toga će nam dotični biti predsjednik, jer u drugom krugu nema dostojnog suparnika kojega bi podržala i ljevica i desnica kao što će njega.
[/quote]

Njega ljevica sigurno neće podržati.Ljevica ima veliki izbor-Josipović,Pusić,Kajin
Bandić je kandidat desnice i ono što je dobro za Josipovića je da će glasovi HDZ-a biti raspršeni na Hebranga,Vidoševića i Bandića.

@fedya
sve se bojim tog rasipanja u drugom krugu … pa kaj nije onaj što je vozio stojku i s tim se hvalio onomad trebo biti predsjednik 100% a kad tamo čuna … Mesić ga podrapo ko hartiju
bit će isčuđavanja bojim se ja

A Toxic Cocktail
by John Browne

Last week, the Fed extended its emergency economic powers, which include lending to the money center banks at zero interest. A few days later, the Fed’s plan was reinforced by similar announcements from the rest of the G-20. The road map the authorities are providing for the near-term global economy can’t be much clearer. There will be no cessation of the seemingly endless supply of cheap dollars being pumped into the financial system. With the world apparently in complete accord on the need for ever more liquidity, stock markets are staging an easy-money rally. The main line media is almost euphoric. But what should investors make of this seemingly good news?

This time last year, the world faced a meltdown of its financial systems and a potential depression. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, a renowned expert on the Great Depression, coordinated an international rescue of the toxic financial system. Although the bill for these operations has yet to come due, almost all agree it will prove costly to present and future generations. For now at least, the most significant impact of these policies has been the creation of a liquidity bubble in stocks and a surge in commodities.

However, any efforts to reduce these stimuli will result in an immediate correction toward our previous depressionary trajectory. Acceptance of this uncomfortable truth is a political third rail. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that any major government will change course. Rather, the change will be thrust upon them.

It could have been argued that some of the actions taken last year were worth the cost if they had corrected the dangerous deficiencies in the financial system. But after a year, what has changed? The same behemoth banks remain, but even larger and yet more demanding of federal salvation. That particular risk has been increased rather than reduced.

Indeed, the four largest banks have been given well over $1 trillion of TARP funds to trade. In addition, with a zero-cost of Fed funds and a positive yield-curve, the banks have been able to generate massive profits without having to incur the risks of lending to the private sector. With such a license to steal, their stock prices have risen dramatically, sending false signals to other market participants of a broader economic recovery. Soon, these burdens to the taxpayer will pay some $140 billion in year-end bonuses. Far from a disaster, it seems as global financial crisis has been a godsend to Wall Street.

The banks also have been allowed to continue manipulating accounting rules to hide their toxic assets, including their multi-trillion-dollar exposures to the murky derivatives market. In addition, the banks continue to face escalating loan, mortgage, and credit card defaults, and an impending crunch in the commercial real estate market.

Despite popular impressions, it is clear that the bailed-out banks still face trouble. Indeed, they face enough trouble to potentially threaten the whole system again.

Could this be the reason that, despite its cautious optimism on the economy, the Fed is intent on maintaining an open source of free money for the banks? If the Fed’s public optimism were to be believed, then why is there a need to continue the "emergency" TARP, bank subsidies, and economic stimulus? Could it be that the Fed is still fearful of a second financial panic? More importantly, will this fear lead to limitless liquidity – even at the cost of the value of the dollar?

The Fed’s laxity would be contained somewhat if the Washington had its fiscal house in order. Unfortunately, with an official projected national debt of $20 trillion by 2015, the Administration is in no position to push for a strong dollar. Nor has Mr. Obama shown any interest in reining in the debt, instead occupying himself with a generous new healthcare entitlement. If the debt cannot be brought under control, a higher interest rate wi

http://www.businessinsider.com/prosecutors-think-the-bear-stearns-jury-was-just-too-stupid-to-understand-the-case-2009-11

http://www.businessinsider.com/bank-of-england-prepares-to-blow-bubble-of-unprecedented-proportions-2009-11

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/timeline.htm

http://www.safehaven.com/article-14999.htm

[wink]

dobar link

Premijerkin savjetnik misli da za Hrvatsku tek slijedi šest teških mjeseci
Lovrinčević: Kriza će sada svakom zakucati na vrata
Možemo očekivati povećanje PDV-a na kruh i mlijeko na deset posto, smanjivanje broja županija na samo deset te upola manje općina.
Autor: Ljubica Gatarić
12.11.2009 17:51
Željko Lovrinčević, Ekonomski institut
Željko Lovrinčević, Ekonomski institut (Foto: Mišo Lišanin)

Slijedi šest teških mjeseci. Dosad je kriza bila samo po novinama i internetskim portalima, ali sad će osobno doći svakome na vrata – izjavio je analitičar Ekonomskog instituta Željko Lovrinčević na godišnjem savjetovanju ekonomista u Opatiji na kojemu je predstavljen kao osobni savjetnik premijerke Jadranke Kosor.

Iduće godine Lovrinčević očekuje stagnaciju, uz veću vjerojatnost da rezultat bude lošiji, dok bi 2011. donijela 3,5 posto rasta. Banke imaju veliku zadršku prema kreditiranju tvrtki, njima nije problem novac, ali trenutačno čiste bilance jer su bile orijentirane na trgovinu i graditeljstvo. Javna poduzeća ne posluju dobro, za što nisu krivi samo direktori, već i ministri koji ih ne nadziru kako treba. – Pitanje je mogu li stari ljudi naučiti nove trikove, rekao je Lovrinčević. Pad nezaposlenosti
Lovrinčević očekuje velik pad nezaposlenosti, a teško razdoblje potrajat će sve do ljeta iduće godine i početka sezone. Vjeruje da će ove godine doći do pada od 6 posto jer industrijska proizvodnja dugo pada, a i veliki naručitelji građevinskih projekata dolaze u krizu i probleme. Zagreb je, primjerice, jedan od njih.

No, kada kriza završi, tada će se vidjeti još veće razlike u razvijenosti između glavnog grada i ostatka Hrvatske jer Zagreb i u krizi bolje prolazi od drugih. Replicirao je ministru financija Šukeru koji je dan prije ponovio da je 87 posto proračuna zadano. – Zadano je samo u nečijim glavama, rekao je Lovrinčević te ustvrdio da pojedinim ministarstvima nedostaje 50 do 100 kvalitetnih ljudi za provedbu i nošenje s reformama.

Hitno treba napraviti registar zaposlenih u javnom sektoru s popisom i njihovim karakteristikama. Novi ministar gospodarstva mora odmah provesti početno restrukturiranje brodogradnje, poljoprivrede i petrokemijske industrije. Lovrinčević je, inače, spominjan i kao jedan od kandidata za ministra gospodarstva, a danas se i u njegovom izlaganju indirektno moglo čuti objašnjenje zašto se nije upustio u takav zahvat.

“Nisam čarobnjak”
– Ja nisam u svijetu Davida Coperfielda. Ovo je krvav posao koji treba raditi organizirano – kazao je Lovrinčević najavivši da treba očekivati i povećanje stope PDV-a na kruh i mlijeko te ostale proizvode na 10 posto, što će sigurno pogoditi najugroženije slojeve. Hoće li do ukidanja nulte stope PDV-a doći već 2010. nije rekao.

Racionalizacija javne uprave trajat će dvije godine, a prema Lovrinčeviću na kraju bi trebalo ostati 10 županija i upola manje općina. U drugoj polovini 2010. doći će do priljeva stranog kapitala jer se očekuje privatizacija državnih poduzeća.

Velika Depresija 2 – san ili java?

Na vašu žalost samo SAN.

Kolega Volksbank budući da ih vi vidim pratite poduže dajte vi nama postotak njihove uspješnosti u predviđanju!